The most common Make.com alternative for agencies is : it is more flexible, cheaper at scale, and can be self-hosted so client data stays on your own infrastructure. If Make’s per-operation pricing or its ceiling on custom logic is the problem, n8n is usually the move.
Answer a few and get a recommendation for your situation.
| n8n | Make | Zapier | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat / self-hosted | Per-operation | Per-task |
| Custom code | Full (JS / Python nodes) | Some | Minimal |
| Self-host & own data | Yes | No | No |
| White-label | Yes | Limited | No |
| Migration effort | Moderate (rebuild flows) | n/a | n/a |
If you are hitting Make’s cost or flexibility limits, n8n is the strongest alternative for an agency. It rebuilds what you have, adds custom logic Make cannot do, and runs on your own infrastructure. AOC migrates agencies from Make to n8n and maintains the result.
Rough estimate. Real pricing depends on your plan and steps per run. n8n assumes self-hosting at a flat cost.
One message with what you want to automate. No spec, no discovery-call gauntlet.
Ayush replies within a day with what to build, on which tool, and roughly what it takes.
White-label, on tech you own, and kept running. You are never locked into us to keep it working.
AOC builds and runs n8n automations for agencies, and migrates you off Zapier or Make. Describe it and Ayush sends back a real scope. White-label, on tech you own, no obligation, reply within a day.